BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 7clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai3,577Mumbai3,477Delhi2,793Kolkata1,869Pune1,594Bangalore1,551Ahmedabad1,170Hyderabad1,100Jaipur843Patna693Surat539Chandigarh501Nagpur451Visakhapatnam409Indore405Raipur398Cochin373Lucknow339Amritsar320Karnataka285Rajkot276Cuttack231Panaji158Agra128Dehradun98Guwahati86Calcutta82Jodhpur67SC61Ranchi52Allahabad51Jabalpur50Telangana45Varanasi36Kerala22Rajasthan9Orissa9Andhra Pradesh8Himachal Pradesh5Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2633Section 54B3Section 1482Condonation of Delay2

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

ITA/317/2019HC Punjab & Haryana30 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 260A

7. ITA No. 329 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 8. ITA No. 345 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 9. ITA No. 390 of 2019 (O&M) Gurinderjit Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents CORAM

PCIT ROHTAK vs. MS DIN DAYAL PURUSHOTAM LAL

ITA/110/2024HC Punjab & Haryana16 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 263Section 263(1)

delay is condoned. the order of the Income Tax decided by a common order in 6 and 2017-18. 4 ) t t ) t t f x n MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.17 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-110-2024(O 2. The Re be sub cancell Income 3. We hav ITAT w settled section

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

ITA/221/2023HC Punjab & Haryana06 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 148

delay of 84 days and 71 days in re-filing of the respective appeals is hereby condoned. ITA-221-2023 (O&M) and ITA-223-2023 (O&M) 5. This order shall dispose of two connected Income Tax Appeals as the issue involved in both the Appeals is common. 6. These Appeals are preferred by the appellant(s) assailing

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

ITA/56/2020HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260Section 54B

Section 54B of the Act. 5. The contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant lacks merit. 6. It is an undisputed fact that after selling the agricultural land the appellant purchased a land worth his share, in the name of his wife. The issue is directly covered by the decision of this Court in Dinesh Verma's case (supra