SHIV CHARAN GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

Bench: The Tribunal On 24.02.2020. [Ajay Tewari] Judge [Avneesh Jhingan] Judge January 20, 2020

Section 254(1) of the Act by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh 'A' Bench, Chandigarh in ITA No.491/CHD/2017 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] for assessment year 2004-05, declining the application for condonation of delay of 167 days. [2] The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even if the explanation for delay was not ironclad

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

4. ITA No. 317 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 5. ITA No. 325 of 2019 (O&M) Gurinderjit Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 6. ITA No. 327 of 2019 (O&M) Gurinderjit Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents TRIPTI SAINI

PUNJAB AGRO INDIA CORPORATION LIMITED vs. D.C.I.T. CIRCLE 4(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal stands dismissed in terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

4 (1) Chandigarh ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN *** Present : Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) CM-11977-CII-2019 This is an application for condonation of delay of 212 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

4. Having regard to the averments made in these applications, the same are allowed delay of 84 days and 71 days in re-filing of the respective appeals is hereby condoned. ITA-221-2023 (O&M) and ITA-223-2023 (O&M) 5. This order shall dispose of two connected Income Tax Appeals as the issue involved in both

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

condonation of wed and accordingly delay is con -2023 Exemption application is allowed esent appeal assails the order pas n the Tribunal has held as under: “5. On the other hand, t assessee supporting the order pas submitted that since the order pass based on the provisions of law and udgement of the Hon'ble Gujarat H Leena Jugal Kishore

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S RURAL EDUCATION AND WOMEN WELFARE SOCIETY

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. ITA No.434 of 2019: This appeal has been filed against the order dated 17.1.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Camp Bench at Jalandhar (for short, 'the Tribunal') allowing the appeal of the assessee and thereby holding it entitled for exemption/approval under Section

MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

delay of 76 and 124 days in refilling the respective appeals is condoned. ITA No.152-2023 ITA No.1149-2023 We dispose of both the aforesaid appeals with a common order as those have arisen out of the same impugned orders. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the order passed by the Pr. Commissioners of Income Tax as well as affirmation order