BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 3(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,425Mumbai2,067Delhi1,670Kolkata1,311Pune1,187Bangalore1,168Hyderabad783Ahmedabad704Jaipur637Chandigarh411Surat296Lucknow278Karnataka267Raipur233Indore224Nagpur209Amritsar154Rajkot143Cochin139Cuttack131Visakhapatnam122Panaji108Calcutta98Patna81SC52Jabalpur46Guwahati46Jodhpur44Dehradun42Telangana33Varanasi31Allahabad30Agra26Ranchi11Orissa7Kerala7Rajasthan6Andhra Pradesh5Punjab & Haryana3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 92C3Section 54F2Section 2712

MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/152/2023HC Punjab & Haryana18 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 120Section 140Section 144Section 263Section 271Section 92C

delay of 76 and 124 days in refilling the respective appeals is condoned. ITA No.152-2023 ITA No.1149-2023 We dispose of both the aforesaid appeals with a common order as those have arisen out of the same impugned orders. Learned counsel for the appellant has assailed the order passed by the Pr. Commissioners of Income Tax as well as affirmation order

PCIT ROHTAK vs. MS DIN DAYAL PURUSHOTAM LAL

ITA/110/2024HC Punjab & Haryana16 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 263Section 263(1)

delay is condoned. the order of the Income Tax decided by a common order in 6 and 2017-18. 4 ) t t ) t t f x n MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.17 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-110-2024(O 2. The Re be sub cancell Income 3. We hav ITAT w settled section

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 54F

1. The pre wherein a s b ju L &M) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( )-II, NEW DELHI Vs. NGH BAIDWAN **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SU **** Mrs. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standi for the appellant. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) -2023 Application for condonation of wed and accordingly delay