BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 11clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,242Mumbai2,192Delhi2,048Kolkata1,251Pune1,249Bangalore1,131Hyderabad825Ahmedabad695Jaipur635Surat391Nagpur366Chandigarh356Raipur343Indore267Karnataka248Visakhapatnam247Amritsar231Lucknow228Cochin222Rajkot196Cuttack154Panaji127Patna89Agra71Calcutta68Guwahati64SC57Jodhpur48Dehradun42Telangana37Allahabad36Jabalpur24Varanasi24Ranchi16Rajasthan9Orissa7Kerala5Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh4Punjab & Haryana3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 106Section 54B3Condonation of Delay3Section 1482Section 12A2Exemption2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S RURAL EDUCATION AND WOMEN WELFARE SOCIETY

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/434/2019HC Punjab & Haryana13 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10Section 12A

delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. ITA No.434 of 2019: This appeal has been filed against the order dated 17.1.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Camp Bench at Jalandhar (for short, 'the Tribunal') allowing the appeal of the assessee and thereby holding it entitled for exemption/approval under Section

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

ITA/221/2023HC Punjab & Haryana06 Mar 2024

MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Bench:
Section 148

11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document {2024:PHHC:032279-DB} ITA-221-2023 (O&M) and ITA-223-2023 (O&M) Page 2 of 3 CM-21926-CII-2023 in ITA-221-2023 CM-21933-CII-2023 in ITA-223-2023 3. These applications are filed by the appellant(s) seeking condonation of delay

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

ITA/56/2020HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260Section 54B

11:21 I attest to the authenticity and integrity of this document HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 56 of 2020 -2- appellant was entitled to exemption under Section 54B of the Act. 5. The contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant lacks merit. 6. It is an undisputed fact that after selling the agricultural land the appellant purchased