SHIV CHARAN GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

Bench: The Tribunal On 24.02.2020. [Ajay Tewari] Judge [Avneesh Jhingan] Judge January 20, 2020

Section 254(1) of the Act by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh 'A' Bench, Chandigarh in ITA No.491/CHD/2017 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] for assessment year 2004-05, declining the application for condonation of delay of 167 days. [2] The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even if the explanation for delay was not ironclad

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

1. ITA No. 330 of 2019 (O&M) Gurinderjit Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 2. ITA No. 315 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents 3. ITA No. 316 of 2019 (O&M) Kesar Singh .....Appellant Vs. PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ...Respondents

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

1. These applications are filed by the appellant(s) seeking condonation of delay of 166 days and 126 days in filing of the respective Appeals. 2. Having regard to the averments made in these applications, the same are allowed delay of 166 days and 126 days in filing of the respective appeals is hereby condoned. Suresh Kumar

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 54B of the Act. 5. The contention raised by learned counsel for the appellant lacks merit. 6. It is an undisputed fact that after selling the agricultural land the appellant purchased a land worth his share, in the name of his wife. The issue is directly covered by the decision of this Court in Dinesh Verma's case (supra

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

1. The pre wherein a s b ju L &M) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( )-II, NEW DELHI Vs. NGH BAIDWAN **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SU **** Mrs. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standi for the appellant. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) -2023 Application for condonation of wed and accordingly delay