BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai2,634Mumbai2,499Delhi2,247Kolkata1,483Pune1,341Bangalore1,265Hyderabad912Ahmedabad827Jaipur720Surat423Chandigarh420Raipur360Nagpur354Indore305Visakhapatnam278Lucknow270Amritsar259Karnataka256Cochin248Rajkot234Cuttack174Patna153Panaji136Calcutta82Agra81Guwahati66Dehradun59SC56Jodhpur54Telangana40Allahabad35Varanasi32Jabalpur31Ranchi23Rajasthan9Kerala7Punjab & Haryana7Orissa7Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 106Condonation of Delay5Section 54B3Exemption3Section 54F2Section 1482Section 260A2Section 12A2Deduction

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S RURAL EDUCATION AND WOMEN WELFARE SOCIETY

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/434/2019HC Punjab & Haryana13 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10Section 12A

delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. ITA No.434 of 2019: This appeal has been filed against the order dated 17.1.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Camp Bench at Jalandhar (for short, 'the Tribunal') allowing the appeal of the assessee and thereby holding it entitled for exemption/approval under Section 10

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

ITA/317/2019HC Punjab & Haryana30 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 260A
2

delay of 58 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Main Appeals This order shall dispose above-numbered appeals preferred by the the Assesses under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) against order dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure A-10) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench A, Chandigarh (hereinafter

RAJAN SETIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/123/2022HC Punjab & Haryana29 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

condonation of delay of 3270 days in refiling the present appeal. The reasons given in the application is that there were certain objections and to remove those objections, sometime was taken to arrange relevant documents. The applicant had to consult various lawyers at Muktsar and after March 2020 on account of lock down, he was not able to consult

SHIV CHARAN GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

ITA/477/2018HC Punjab & Haryana20 Jan 2020

Bench: The Tribunal On 24.02.2020. [Ajay Tewari] Judge [Avneesh Jhingan] Judge January 20, 2020

Section 254(1)Section 260A

Section 254(1) of the Act by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh 'A' Bench, Chandigarh in ITA No.491/CHD/2017 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'] for assessment year 2004-05, declining the application for condonation of delay of 167 days. [2] The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that even if the explanation for delay was not ironclad

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

ITA/221/2023HC Punjab & Haryana06 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 148

delay of 84 days and 71 days in re-filing of the respective appeals is hereby condoned. ITA-221-2023 (O&M) and ITA-223-2023 (O&M) 5. This order shall dispose of two connected Income Tax Appeals as the issue involved in both the Appeals is common. 6. These Appeals are preferred by the appellant(s) assailing

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

ITA/56/2020HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260Section 54B

10, 2020 BAHADUR SINGH APPELLANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J (Oral): CM No. 3147-CII of 2020 Application is allowed as prayed for. ITA No. 56 of 2020 This appeal has been

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 54F

condonation of wed and accordingly delay is con -2023 Exemption application is allowed esent appeal assails the order pas n the Tribunal has held as under: “5. On the other hand, t assessee supporting the order pas submitted that since the order pass based on the provisions of law and udgement of the Hon'ble Gujarat H Leena Jugal Kishore