BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “condonation of delay”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai6,162Mumbai5,355Delhi4,820Kolkata3,420Pune2,601Bangalore2,305Ahmedabad1,653Hyderabad1,619Jaipur1,071Patna1,049Cochin772Chandigarh764Nagpur704Cuttack700Surat681Indore622Visakhapatnam504Amritsar478Lucknow462Raipur451Karnataka391Rajkot388Agra340Calcutta258Panaji253Dehradun156Guwahati143Jodhpur119Jabalpur102Ranchi96SC79Telangana77Allahabad68Varanasi44Kerala32Andhra Pradesh21Orissa14Punjab & Haryana12Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Uttarakhand1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay8Section 2636Section 106Section 92C3Section 54B3Exemption3Section 54F2Section 2712Section 148

RAJAN SETIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/123/2022HC Punjab & Haryana29 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

condonation of delay of 3270 days in re-filing the appeal. There is no valid explanation given for condonation

KESAR SINGH vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

ITA/317/2019HC Punjab & Haryana30 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Section 260A

delay of 47 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. TRIPTI SAINI 2019.11.08 10:03 I attest

2
Section 2602
Deduction2
Penalty2

PUNJAB AGRO INDIA CORPORATION LIMITED vs. D.C.I.T. CIRCLE 4(1), CHANDIGARH

Appeal stands dismissed in terms

ITA/235/2019HC Punjab & Haryana21 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260

condonation of delay of 212 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons recorded in the application

SHIV CHARAN GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER

ITA/477/2018HC Punjab & Haryana20 Jan 2020

Bench: The Tribunal On 24.02.2020. [Ajay Tewari] Judge [Avneesh Jhingan] Judge January 20, 2020

Section 254(1)Section 260A

delay. Consequently, we deem it appropriate to set aside the order declining the condonation of delay. We direct

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) LUDHIANA vs. M/S PUNJAB RICE LAND PVT LTD

The Appeals are dismissed

ITA/221/2023HC Punjab & Haryana06 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 148

condonation of delay of 166 days and 126 days in filing of the respective Appeals. 2. Having regard

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S RURAL EDUCATION AND WOMEN WELFARE SOCIETY

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/434/2019HC Punjab & Haryana13 Jan 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10Section 12A

condonation of delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal. Allowed as prayed for. The delay

PCIT ROHTAK vs. MS DIN DAYAL PURUSHOTAM LAL

ITA/110/2024HC Punjab & Haryana16 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 263Section 263(1)

delay is condoned. the order of the Income Tax decided by a common order in 6 and 2017-18. 4 ) t t ) t t f x n MOHIT

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LDH. vs. M/S QUTAB CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.

ITA/102/2011HC Punjab & Haryana16 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

condonation of delay of 237 days in re-filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LDH. vs. M/S CHAVAN RISHI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.

ITA/63/2011HC Punjab & Haryana16 Oct 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

condonation of delay of 416 days in re-filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application

BAHADUR SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX (APPEALS) FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

ITA/56/2020HC Punjab & Haryana10 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 260Section 54B

condonation of delay of 946 days in filing the present appeal. [AJAY TEWARI] JUDGE [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE FEBRUARY

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI vs. MANJIT SINGH BAIDWAN

ITA/59/2023HC Punjab & Haryana09 May 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 54F

condonation of wed and accordingly delay is con -2023 Exemption application is allowed esent appeal assails the order

MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/152/2023HC Punjab & Haryana18 Mar 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 120Section 140Section 144Section 263Section 271Section 92C

delay of 76 and 124 days in refilling the respective appeals is condoned. ITA No.152-2023 ITA No.1149-2023 We dispose