BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka474Delhi433Mumbai348Bangalore176Chennai149Ahmedabad108Jaipur93Hyderabad83Chandigarh79Kolkata57Pune47Cochin46Lucknow30Indore25Rajkot19Calcutta17Cuttack16Visakhapatnam15Amritsar15Agra15Telangana10Nagpur8Jodhpur7Raipur7Varanasi7Surat7SC4Allahabad4Rajasthan3Patna3Ranchi3Punjab & Haryana2Panaji2Jabalpur1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)3Section 12A3Section 112Exemption2

M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

ITA/271/2014HC Punjab & Haryana04 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11

80 crores was approved. A 1000 beds hospital was planned to be constructed in a phased manner. With the said objects, the PIMS Society had been set up and it was granted the aforesaid registration. In October 2011, it decided to have the main sources of funding through development of 104 acres of land, which was purchased by the PIMS

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/161/2016HC Punjab & Haryana17 Nov 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Section 12ASection 2(15)
Section 260A

80,346/- 2005-06 10,13,765/- 2006-07 36,39,146/- 2007-08 10,97,950/- 21. The entire emphasis of the revenue is on the fact that the assessee-Trust had earned profits by selling plots. This itself cannot be a ground for denying the benefit under Section 11 of the Act, especially when it is not disputed