COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

4. The facts in brief are that the assessee i.e. Improvement Trust, Bathinda is a Trust constituted under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 (for short '1922 Act'). Vide order dated 16.08.2010, the assessee was PANKAJ BAWEJA 2018.09.20 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document [HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA vs. YOUNG SCHOLARS EDUCAITON SOCIETY, BARNALA

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Act”) Against The Order Dated 16.07.2010 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench-A, Chandigarh (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Itat”) In Ita No. 510/Chd/2010 - M/S Young Scholars Educational Society, Barnala Vs Cit, Patiala, Whereby The Order Dated 26.03.2010 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Commissioner”) Was Quashed & The Varinder Singh 2024.05.13 10:09 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

Section 12A of the Act vide order dated 22.11.1993 has been restored. 3. Facts relating to ITA No. 94 of 2011 are being noticed for disposal of the appeal which raise common questions. 4 Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that assessee - Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Education Trust is an Educational Trust claiming to be engaged in charitable

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI PANCHAYATI GAUSHALA SOCIETY, ROHTAK (PAN-AAETS0228G)

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Charitable Trust vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) and others. [(1999) 152 CTR (Delhi 322]? (v) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Appellate Tribunal is contrary to the evidence and material on the record of the case and therefore, perverse?” Relevant facts are that the society was established on 16.5.1956 with the following

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

4. : 7.22.96.300.00 26,81,23,070.17 Less: 15% set apart or accumulated u/s 11(1)(a) : 4.02.18.461.00 Income required to be applied as per 22,79,04,609.17 Section 11(1)(a) Less: Fixed assets considered as applied towards income from properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

charitable societies, trusts, etc. and from State and Central Governments and other national and international institutions/bodies subject to the rules and regulations of the Government and other authorities, to invest the funds of the society with such individuals, societies, firms or companies for providing income to society, on such terms and conditions as may deem proper and necessary

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHREE DURGA MATA MANDIR, VILLAGE-PIPLIWALA TOWN , CHANDIGARH

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Trust, Meerut, wherein it was held that the Tribunal could have ordered for setting aside the order of Registering Authority refusing registration but it could not have directed for registration straight away in as much as MANOJ KUMAR 2020.03.06 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court,Chandigarh