COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA vs. YOUNG SCHOLARS EDUCAITON SOCIETY, BARNALA

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Act”) Against The Order Dated 16.07.2010 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench-A, Chandigarh (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Itat”) In Ita No. 510/Chd/2010 - M/S Young Scholars Educational Society, Barnala Vs Cit, Patiala, Whereby The Order Dated 26.03.2010 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Commissioner”) Was Quashed & The Varinder Singh 2024.05.13 10:09 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

13. We have considered the submissions. Before we advert to the facts of the case, it would be apposite to quote Sections 12A and 12AA (3) of the Act for answering the questions of law, as noted above:- “12A. [Conditions for applicability of sections 11 and 12] (1) The provisions of section 11 and section 12 shall not apply

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

1)Improvement Trust Bathinda is providing “Public utility services” and not for the purpose of profit. (2)That the functions of Improvement Trust Bathinda in Punjab is the same before the amendment of the Act and after the amendment of section 2(15) of the Act. (3)From the Balance sheet we find that there is always Loss. PANKAJ BAWEJA

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH vs. MUKAND LAL COLLEGE SOCIETY

Appeal is dismissed being devoid of any merit

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

13 of the Income Tax Act and that the income of the charitable trust was not assessable under the head “Profits and gains of business” under Section 28 in which the provision for carry forward of losses was relevant. That, in the case of a charitable trust, there was no provision for carry forward of the excess of expenditure

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

1)(a) Less: Fixed assets considered as applied towards income from properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income Nil Unapplied fixed assets expenditure during the year : 42,94,59,527.56” 3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

1. The present appeal, !iled at the revenue’s instance, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short - the Act), is directed against order dated 08.04.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench “B” Chandigarh (for short – the Tribunal). GOPAL KRISHAN 2026.02.19 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document