COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. BABA GANDHA SINGH EDUCATION TRUST, BARNALA

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (3), where a trust or an institution has been granted registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) or has obtained registration at any time under section 12A [as it stood before its amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996) and subsequently it is noticed that— SUNIL

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

4,72,723/- 2004-05 80,346/- 2005-06 10,13,765/- 2006-07 36,39,146/- 2007-08 10,97,950/- 21. The entire emphasis of the revenue is on the fact that the assessee-Trust had earned profits by selling plots. This itself cannot be a ground for denying the benefit under Section 11 of the Act, especially

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI PANCHAYATI GAUSHALA SOCIETY, ROHTAK (PAN-AAETS0228G)

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Charitable Trust vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) and others. [(1999) 152 CTR (Delhi 322]? (v) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Appellate Tribunal is contrary to the evidence and material on the record of the case and therefore, perverse?” Relevant facts are that the society was established on 16.5.1956 with the following

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

4. : 7.22.96.300.00 26,81,23,070.17 Less: 15% set apart or accumulated u/s 11(1)(a) : 4.02.18.461.00 Income required to be applied as per 22,79,04,609.17 Section 11(1)(a) Less: Fixed assets considered as applied towards income from properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

trusts, etc. and from State and Central Governments and other national and international institutions/bodies subject to the rules and regulations of the Government and other authorities, to invest the funds of the society with such individuals, societies, firms or companies for providing income to society, on such terms and conditions as may deem proper and necessary for the fulfillment

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHREE DURGA MATA MANDIR, VILLAGE-PIPLIWALA TOWN , CHANDIGARH

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Trust, Meerut, wherein it was held that the Tribunal could have ordered for setting aside the order of Registering Authority refusing registration but it could not have directed for registration straight away in as much as MANOJ KUMAR 2020.03.06 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court,Chandigarh