COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA vs. BABA GANDHA SINGH EDUCATION TRUST, BARNALA

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

charitable purposes as defined under Section 2(15) of 1961 Act and is available to trust or institution or society. Therefore, interpretation of Section 10(23C) of 1961 Act cannot be read in place of provisions of Section 12AA of 1961 Act. The judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s. New Noble Educational Society Vs. The Chief Commissioner

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST BATHINDA

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

1)Improvement Trust Bathinda is providing “Public utility services” and not for the purpose of profit. (2)That the functions of Improvement Trust Bathinda in Punjab is the same before the amendment of the Act and after the amendment of section 2(15) of the Act. (3)From the Balance sheet we find that there is always Loss. PANKAJ BAWEJA

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH vs. MUKAND LAL COLLEGE SOCIETY

Appeal is dismissed being devoid of any merit

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

charitable and religious purposes in the subsequent year in which adjustment has been made having regard to the benevolent provisions contained in section 11 of the Act and that such adjustment will have to be excluded from the income of the trust under Section 11(1

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI PANCHAYATI GAUSHALA SOCIETY, ROHTAK (PAN-AAETS0228G)

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

1)] of section 12A, shall— (a) call for such documents or information from the trust or institution as he thinks necessary in order to satisfy himself about the genuineness of activities of the trust or institution and may also make such inquiries as he may deem necessary in this behalf; and (b) after satisfying himself about the objects

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

1)(a) Less: Fixed assets considered as applied towards income from properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income Nil Unapplied fixed assets expenditure during the year : 42,94,59,527.56” 3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

1. The present appeal, !iled at the revenue’s instance, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short - the Act), is directed against order dated 08.04.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench “B” Chandigarh (for short – the Tribunal). GOPAL KRISHAN 2026.02.19 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHREE DURGA MATA MANDIR, VILLAGE-PIPLIWALA TOWN , CHANDIGARH

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 153 of 2019 Date of decision: 2.3.2020 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh .. Appellant v. M/.s Shree Durga Mata Mandir .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant. ... AVNEESH JHINGAN