M/S PUNJAB INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, GARHA ROAD , JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JALANDHAR AND ANR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate, for the Assessee. Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing Counsel, for the Revenue. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. These are two sets of Income Tax Appeals. ITA Nos. 52, 164 of 2017; 48, 61 of 2020; 196, 197, 199; and 200 of 2023 have been filed by the Revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PATIALA vs. YOUNG SCHOLARS EDUCAITON SOCIETY, BARNALA

Bench: This Court Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Act”) Against The Order Dated 16.07.2010 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench-A, Chandigarh (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Itat”) In Ita No. 510/Chd/2010 - M/S Young Scholars Educational Society, Barnala Vs Cit, Patiala, Whereby The Order Dated 26.03.2010 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala (Hereinafter To Be Referred As “The Commissioner”) Was Quashed & The Varinder Singh 2024.05.13 10:09 I Attest To The Accuracy & Authencity Of This Order/Judgment

JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Amanpreet Singh (A.P.), Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Sidhant Suri, Advocate, for the respondent in ITA No. 21 of 2011. Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Divya Suri, and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocates, for the respondent in ITA No. 94 of 2011. SANJEEV PRAKASH

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

Bench: MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL,MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI

JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Senior Panel Counel, for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Kumar Mukhi, Advocate for the respondent. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. 1. The present appeal, !iled at the revenue’s instance, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short - the Act), is directed against order dated 08.04.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISHT Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Abhinav Narang, Advocate, and Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate, for the respondent. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. These are seven appeals which have been taken up together for adjudication. However, the facts have been taken from

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI PANCHAYATI GAUSHALA SOCIETY, ROHTAK (PAN-AAETS0228G)

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant. ... AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. The revenue has filed this appeal against the order dated 9.4.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short, 'the Tribunal'). The appeal of the respondent-society (hereinafter referred to as 'the society') was allowed and Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHREE DURGA MATA MANDIR, VILLAGE-PIPLIWALA TOWN , CHANDIGARH

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. Denesh Goyal, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant. ... AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. The revenue is in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act') against the order dated 7.9.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, 'the Tribunal') claiming following substantial questions of law: “(i) Whether