BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 19clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,823Delhi3,719Bangalore1,630Chennai1,344Kolkata955Ahmedabad689Jaipur572Hyderabad512Karnataka354Surat326Pune296Chandigarh284Indore247Raipur187Cochin152Rajkot136Nagpur128Agra85Lucknow79Visakhapatnam78SC75Calcutta72Telangana68Amritsar63Cuttack62Panaji55Guwahati43Dehradun32Patna26Jabalpur25Jodhpur23Allahabad19Kerala13Ranchi12Varanasi9Rajasthan9Punjab & Haryana4Orissa2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 260A2Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2

RAMESH KUMAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/396/2019HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263

19,2020 Sh. Ramesh Kumar .. Appellant v. Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present: Mr. B. M. Monga and Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocates for the appellant. ... AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. The assessee is in appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act') against

INDERPAL SINGH AHUJA vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER-CUM-A.C.I.T. ORS

ITA/338/2006HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260A

Section 260A can examine question of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer to enhance declared sale consideration. Having held that Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to enhance declared sale consideration for the purpose of assessment of capital gain, the question remains whether there was some evidence to reject declared value. The appellant is claiming that there was no concrete evidence to reject declared

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

capital is bor respect of the sa Section 28 of th business or prof 16. Ad trading of yarn/ share trading ac shares/securities approved by the 17. The reflected shares auditor. The app the relevant asse 18. It Vardhman Poly shares were fre (O&M) and other connected ca e aid of section 14A is unnecessa the three assessment years

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

gains of business or profession". Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business or profession and no deduction or allowance shall be made