BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 17(5)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,572Delhi2,921Bangalore1,680Chennai1,352Ahmedabad896Kolkata847Jaipur739Hyderabad605Surat401Indore367Pune337Chandigarh281Cochin224Karnataka222Visakhapatnam202Raipur160Rajkot152Nagpur133Cuttack121Agra94Lucknow85SC78Guwahati70Calcutta62Panaji57Amritsar57Telangana51Dehradun28Jodhpur28Allahabad22Patna19Ranchi18Kerala12Varanasi10Jabalpur6Rajasthan6A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

5. In v trading in share (O&M) and other connected ca and articles of association also, ctivity. On 13.03.1997, the mem Object No.28 in the memorandum To deal, invest in and acquire an shares, debentures, debenture-s curities issued or guaranteed by ate, Dominions, Sovereigns, Mun dies and shares, stocks, debentu d securities issued and guarant m or person

BHARTI BHUSHAN JINDAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

ITA/385/2014HC Punjab & Haryana03 Jul 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 271
Section 36(1)(vii)
Section 36(2)
Section 41(1)
Section 56
Section 57

5.. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole record of this case. 6. This Court, vide order dated 15.12.2015, admitted the present appeal for determination of following substantial questions of law:- (i) Whether under the facts & circumstances of the case, the action for rejecting the claim for allowance of bad debts under Section