BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,819Delhi4,629Bangalore1,931Chennai1,625Kolkata1,281Ahmedabad872Hyderabad703Jaipur688Pune456Surat440Karnataka402Chandigarh350Indore312Raipur216Cochin196Nagpur154Rajkot154Visakhapatnam138Cuttack112Amritsar109Lucknow104Agra99Panaji87SC87Calcutta84Telangana84Guwahati51Jodhpur48Dehradun47Patna44Ranchi40Allahabad23Kerala21Varanasi20Jabalpur20Orissa8Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Deduction2

BHARTI BHUSHAN JINDAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

ITA/385/2014HC Punjab & Haryana03 Jul 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 271Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)Section 41(1)Section 56Section 57

gains and other sources. The income from other sources comprises of interest income received from banks and FDRs and also on unsecured loans. The total interest received on loans by the assessee during the year was Rs.4,17,600/-. The claim of the assessee is VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.07.07 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this

INDERPAL SINGH AHUJA vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER-CUM-A.C.I.T. ORS

ITA/338/2006HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260A

Section 260A can examine question of jurisdiction of Assessing Officer to enhance declared sale consideration. Having held that Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to enhance declared sale consideration for the purpose of assessment of capital gain, the question remains whether there was some evidence to reject declared value. The appellant is claiming that there was no concrete evidence to reject declared

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-109-2025 ( the all disa 23. pur ANALYSIS OF 15. A b the amount of business or prof of capital is bor respect of the sa Section 28 of th business or prof 16. Ad trading of yarn/ share trading ac shares/securities approved

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/document P&H HC, Chandigarh ITA Nos. 244, 281, 282, 283 & 630 of 2005 2023:PHHC:056092-DB 2 Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate & Mr. Nishant Mishra, Advocate for the appellant (s). Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Standing counsel for the respondent-department. *** Ritu