BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(38)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,286Delhi2,619Bangalore1,056Chennai900Ahmedabad752Kolkata731Jaipur625Hyderabad409Pune322Chandigarh285Indore284Karnataka187Surat172Cochin165Raipur134Rajkot99Nagpur93Cuttack91Agra86Calcutta85Lucknow80Visakhapatnam77Guwahati56Amritsar55SC40Telangana36Ranchi31Dehradun27Panaji19Patna19Jodhpur18Allahabad13Jabalpur13Varanasi11Kerala10Rajasthan5Orissa4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2

RAMESH KUMAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/396/2019HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263

capital gain of `10,99,599/-, claimed by the assessee as exempt under Section 10(38) of the Act. The assessee

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

38,000/- paid to M/s Mckinsey and Company Ltd for professional serviced rendered by it. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed both the claims of the assessee-Company, vide order dated 26.02.1999 (A-1). Feeling aggrieved against the above order, the appellant- Company preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the same was partly allowed