BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(37)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,330Delhi2,770Bangalore1,125Chennai903Ahmedabad703Kolkata699Jaipur536Hyderabad368Chandigarh344Surat326Pune316Karnataka244Indore227Cochin225Raipur135Cuttack97Nagpur88Visakhapatnam86Rajkot80Guwahati74Amritsar69Calcutta64SC52Lucknow50Panaji45Telangana43Dehradun25Agra25Ranchi21Jabalpur14Varanasi14Jodhpur13Patna13Allahabad11Kerala10Rajasthan5Punjab & Haryana4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 35D3Deduction3Section 2602

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

gains of business or profession". Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business or profession and no deduction or allowance shall be made

M/S MAJESTIC AUTO LTD vs. COMMISSIONER OF IT & ANR

ITA/290/2005HC Punjab & Haryana05 Dec 2025

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260Section 35D

10:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ITA-290-2005 (O&M) -5- more of the nature as notified in Sub Section (2). The appellant concededly incurred expenses with respected to feasibility of project. The expenses were incurred by way of travelling and staff salary. Those expenses directly related to expansion of undertaking as well

BHARTI BHUSHAN JINDAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LUDHIANA

ITA/385/2014HC Punjab & Haryana03 Jul 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Section 142(2)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 271Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)Section 41(1)Section 56Section 57

37 read with Section 57(iii) is justified as a revenue item without considering the stand of ‘charging to tax’ the recovery so made under Section 41(1) of the Act? 7. Before proceeding further, it would be apposite to reproduce the relevant provisions of the IT Act and relevant portion of order dated 13.07.2012 passed by the learned Tribunal

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

10. We these cases. 11. The whether the sha M/s Vardhman (O&M) and other connected ca at the appellant had purchased th he intention of trading in such s t entitled to deduction on acco cquisition of such shares. further contended that the Ass e shares of other companies by h meant for trading and of M/ herefore