BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(25)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,908Delhi2,468Bangalore1,152Chennai766Ahmedabad615Kolkata570Jaipur528Hyderabad446Chandigarh287Pune287Surat271Karnataka257Indore215Cochin165Raipur160Visakhapatnam113Rajkot91Agra80Nagpur80Cuttack73Lucknow64Guwahati63Amritsar60Calcutta58SC53Telangana51Panaji49Ranchi23Jodhpur20Patna15Dehradun11Allahabad11Jabalpur10Kerala9Varanasi7Rajasthan6Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati1Orissa1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

10(33), the resultan t fall in the computation of gro ke of arguments that deduction purchase of shares was allowab the decision of the Supreme arehousing Corporation (supra), bar the deduction. We hold acco We may, however, place o re to be made only with ref allowance shall not be warrante view of the proviso to section voking section

M/S KWALITY CAFE & RESTAURANT P LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/585/2006HC Punjab & Haryana18 Apr 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 260A

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 07.04.2006 (Annexure A-3) passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, whereby appeal filed by the revenue-respondent against the order dated 22.03.2000 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chandigarh, has been partly accepted. Brief facts of the case are that