BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Long Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,822Delhi3,465Chennai1,583Bangalore1,371Kolkata1,239Ahmedabad710Jaipur570Hyderabad494Pune415Indore216Chandigarh198Surat197Cochin155Nagpur140Raipur115Lucknow105Visakhapatnam102Rajkot72Patna71Calcutta70Agra61Guwahati54Panaji50Ranchi44SC42Cuttack42Amritsar40Jodhpur35Karnataka31Dehradun24Jabalpur19Telangana11Allahabad11Varanasi9Kerala8Rajasthan8Punjab & Haryana6Orissa4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 260A3Section 143(3)3Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2Deduction2Addition to Income2

RAMESH KUMAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is dismissed

ITA/396/2019HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2020

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263

long term capital gain on shares, the case was selected for scrutiny. Notice along with questionnaire was issued

M/S KWALITY CAFE & RESTAURANT P LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR.

Appeal is dismissed

ITA/585/2006HC Punjab & Haryana18 Apr 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 260A

long term capital gains for surrender of goodwill of ‘Kwality’ trade mark and Rs.45 Lakhs towards termination of ice-cream

INDERPAL SINGH AHUJA vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER-CUM-A.C.I.T. ORS

ITA/338/2006HC Punjab & Haryana19 Feb 2026

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL,MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Section 260A

long-term capital gain and consequential tax liability. The appellant preferred appeal which came to be dismissed vide

M/S VIJAY KUMAR GARG CONTRACTORS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is allowed

ITA/110/2003HC Punjab & Haryana08 Aug 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

long terms capital gain of amount of Rs. 23,49,426 Was rom the income for working out an amount

M/S PANCHSHEEL TEXTILE MANFAC. & TRAD. vs. C I T AND ANR.

ITA/109/2007HC Punjab & Haryana13 May 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

term investme nt appeals be dismissed. e have heard learned counsel for e question involved for consider ares purchased and held by the ap Polytex Ltd., constitute stock-in ases -5- he shares of M/s Vardhman Poly shares but purely as an investme ount of the interest paid on mon sessing Officer has given differ holding that sale of shares

M/S ROCKMAN CYCLES INDS. LTD. vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, LDH. AND ANR.

The appeals are allowed and impugned orders are

ITA/244/2005HC Punjab & Haryana09 Feb 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 143Section 260Section 37

gains of business or profession". Explanation 1.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business or profession and no deduction or allowance shall be made