BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 30clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,971Delhi2,896Bangalore1,406Chennai972Kolkata712Ahmedabad531Hyderabad516Pune414Jaipur331Indore306Cochin242Chandigarh235Karnataka221Patna198Raipur197Surat137Visakhapatnam125Lucknow105Nagpur100Cuttack97Rajkot96Amritsar66Ranchi52Jodhpur48Dehradun47Guwahati42Agra36Telangana24Panaji22Allahabad18Jabalpur17SC17Varanasi11Kerala9Calcutta7Punjab & Haryana2Orissa2Uttarakhand2Rajasthan2

Key Topics

Section 11B2TDS2

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. SH.RAVINDER SINGH NAGI PLOT NO. 797 JANTA LAND & PROMOTERS LTD SEC 90-91 GREATER MOHALI

ITA/46/2018HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Section 11BSection 83

TDS Management who were otherwise liable, also deposited the same amount of service tax on 07.04.2015, 03.07.2015 and 05.08.2015, in relation to the services provided. On coming to know, the appellant-company, therefore, moved appropriate application on 30.08.2016, seeking refund of the amount of tax paid to the Central Excise and Service Tax Division, Ambala City. They were asked

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144
Section 80

TDS was deducted and deposited in the Government account. Since no information was furnished by the assessee nor any evidence is available on record to substantiate the claim of the assessee as genuine, the expenses of Rs.2,00,00,000/- not relating to the business were disallowed and added to the income of the assessee.” Against the said order