PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order on the premise as under:- “On perusal of records as well as per the enquiries/ investigations conducted by the Investigation Directorate of the Department during the search and post-search enquiries, many discrepancies and violations of provisions of Sections

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS)-1, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD, PLOT NO. 21, I.T. PARK, CHANDIGARH (TAN: PTLB10577A)

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

TDS)-1, C Vs. irtel Ltd. Chandigarh **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN **** Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Co for the Income Tax Department/R Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate an Mr. Smeesh Bassi, Advocate For **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) By way of this common order, These appeals have been preferr order passed

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. SH.RAVINDER SINGH NAGI PLOT NO. 797 JANTA LAND & PROMOTERS LTD SEC 90-91 GREATER MOHALI

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

3] (for short ‘the Act, 1944’) which has been made applicable to service tax matters by virtue of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1944, which stipulates that any person seeking refund of any duty may make an application before the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, within one year from the relevant date. The Commissioner (Appeals)’s order dated

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) - 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD.

The appeals are hereby dismissed

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

TDS)-2, Chandigarh . . . . Appellant Vs. M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. . . . . Respondent Date of Decision: 07.11.2024 **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH **** Present: Mr. Amanpreet (A.P.) Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant(s)/Income Tax Department. Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Jolly, Advocate (through video conferencing) For the respondent(s). **** SANJEEV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S TDS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT LTD

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Hon'Ble Itat Is Justified In Dismissing The Miscellaneous Application Of The Revenue Without Discussing The Merits Ignoring The Legislative Intent Expressed In Cbdt'S Anuradha 2020.02.12 17:37 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

TDS Management Consultant Pvt. Ld. ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN *** Present : Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing counsel for the appellant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 27.3.2019 relating