BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,212Delhi6,038Bangalore2,826Chennai2,498Kolkata1,785Pune1,198Ahmedabad825Hyderabad825Karnataka654Cochin640Patna559Jaipur512Raipur447Indore434Chandigarh375Nagpur363Surat284Visakhapatnam255Rajkot211Lucknow192Cuttack146Amritsar136Dehradun125Jodhpur111Ranchi84Telangana81Panaji77Jabalpur76Agra75Guwahati65Allahabad41Calcutta31Varanasi29SC28Kerala19Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3Bombay1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1947TDS6Section 14A4Section 2634Section 11B2Section 11(1)(a)2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144Section 80

Section 80-G. (10) The assessee-company had claimed total expenses of Rs.1,97,72,54,772/- under different heads in the P & L Account. No details were furnished by the assessee to prove the genuineness of these expenses. Moreover, the expenses under various heads were allowable only when TDS was deducted and deposited in the Government account. Since

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)
Section 263

2. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurugram has preferred these appeals against the order dated 19.08.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘G’, New Delhi, whereby it has set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the PCIT’) passed under Section 263 of the Income

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. SH.RAVINDER SINGH NAGI PLOT NO. 797 JANTA LAND & PROMOTERS LTD SEC 90-91 GREATER MOHALI

ITA/46/2018HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Section 11BSection 83

2] Management Consultant Pvt. Ltd. (for short ‘the TDS Management”) to supply services of manpower during the financial years 2014-15 and 2015- 16. It is stated that TDS Management was liable to pay service tax on the service rendered by them. It is stated that the appellant-company also deposited service

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/42/2021HC Punjab & Haryana10 Mar 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA

Section 194

TDS)-2, Chandigarh …Appellant Vs. M/s Vodafone Idea Limited (earlier known as Vodafone Mobile Services Limited). ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocate for the appellant(s). *** LISA GILL , J. (ORAL) 1. All the above titled four appeals are being taken up together for hearing at request

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS)-1, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD, PLOT NO. 21, I.T. PARK, CHANDIGARH (TAN: PTLB10577A)

ITA/433/2018HC Punjab & Haryana12 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 194

2. T assailing the o and ITA-437-2018 HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR sioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1, C Vs. irtel Ltd. Chandigarh sioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1, C Vs. irtel Ltd. Chandigarh **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN **** Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Co for the Income

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S TDS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT LTD

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/382/2019HC Punjab & Haryana06 Feb 2020

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Hon'Ble Itat Is Justified In Dismissing The Miscellaneous Application Of The Revenue Without Discussing The Merits Ignoring The Legislative Intent Expressed In Cbdt'S Anuradha 2020.02.12 17:37 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

Section 14ASection 260

TDS Management Consultant Pvt. Ld. ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN *** Present : Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing counsel for the appellant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 27.3.2019 relating

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) - 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD.

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/8533/2018HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 194

TDS)-2, Chandigarh . . . . Appellant Vs. M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. . . . . Respondent Date of Decision: 07.11.2024 **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH **** Present: Mr. Amanpreet (A.P.) Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant(s)/Income Tax Department. Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Jolly, Advocate (through video conferencing) For the respondent(s). **** SANJEEV