BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 16clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,684Mumbai3,649Bangalore1,941Chennai1,372Kolkata885Pune713Ahmedabad710Hyderabad693Indore553Jaipur437Chandigarh367Cochin340Raipur296Karnataka260Visakhapatnam233Nagpur232Surat227Patna189Cuttack168Rajkot145Lucknow106Jabalpur85Amritsar80Dehradun68Jodhpur52Panaji51Ranchi50Agra48Guwahati46Telangana37Allahabad33SC18Varanasi13Calcutta11Kerala11Rajasthan6Himachal Pradesh6J&K5Punjab & Haryana3Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 1943Section 11B2Section 11(1)(a)2TDS2

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. SH.RAVINDER SINGH NAGI PLOT NO. 797 JANTA LAND & PROMOTERS LTD SEC 90-91 GREATER MOHALI

ITA/46/2018HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Section 11BSection 83

16. It is stated that TDS Management was liable to pay service tax on the service rendered by them. It is stated that the appellant-company also deposited service tax on 29.06.2015, 06.07.2015 and 15.09.2015 of a total amount of Rs.4,46,187/-. On the other hand, the TDS Management who were otherwise liable, also deposited the same amount

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) - 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD.

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/8533/2018HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 194

TDS)-2, Chandigarh . . . . Appellant Vs. M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. . . . . Respondent Date of Decision: 07.11.2024 **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH **** Present: Mr. Amanpreet (A.P.) Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant(s)/Income Tax Department. Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Jolly, Advocate (through video conferencing) For the respondent(s). **** SANJEEV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)Section 263

TDS in the payments and the entire accounts were fraudulent. 6. Learned counsel for the Revenue further submitted that the mess charges were actually not paid and the amount has been siphoned to constitute as mess expenses. It is her submission that the ITAT did not even bother to produce the investigation report prepared by the Inspector for the purpose