BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 11(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,593Mumbai4,591Bangalore2,376Chennai1,697Kolkata1,158Pune885Hyderabad592Ahmedabad563Jaipur407Indore370Raipur350Karnataka333Cochin304Chandigarh279Nagpur210Visakhapatnam160Surat136Rajkot126Lucknow124Jodhpur66Cuttack57Patna57Ranchi54Amritsar52Agra45Telangana44Dehradun42Panaji41Guwahati37Jabalpur22SC21Allahabad15Kerala13Calcutta11Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Varanasi5Punjab & Haryana3J&K3Uttarakhand3Orissa2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 11B2Section 11(1)(a)2TDS2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)Section 263

1)(a) Less: Fixed assets considered as applied towards income from properties held for charitable purposes during the year during the year 65.73.64.136.73 22,79,04,609.17 Total Taxable Income Nil Unapplied fixed assets expenditure during the year : 42,94,59,527.56” 3. The PCIT invoking its powers under Section 263 of the Act revised the assessment order

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144
Section 80

1) During the assessment proceedings, the identity and creditworthiness of the parties subscribed share capital remained unproved and the genuineness of the transaction was also unproved, therefore, the capital of Rs.55,00,000/- was treated as income from undisclosed sources of the assessee’s company. (2) No information/details in respect of the share application money amounting to Rs.51

THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 CHANDIGARH vs. SH.RAVINDER SINGH NAGI PLOT NO. 797 JANTA LAND & PROMOTERS LTD SEC 90-91 GREATER MOHALI

ITA/46/2018HC Punjab & Haryana09 Sept 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Section 11BSection 83

11. The issue arises as to whether the statutory limit prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Act, 1944, would apply squarely in terms of Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, with respect to claim of payment for refund of wrongly deposited amount as service tax. Section 11B of the Act, 1944 was made applicable to service