PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

TDS in the payments and the entire accounts were fraudulent. 6. Learned counsel for the Revenue further submitted that the mess charges were actually not paid and the amount has been siphoned to constitute as mess expenses. It is her submission that the ITAT did not even bother to produce the investigation report prepared by the Inspector for the purpose

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S TDS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT LTD

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: It Should Be Reinstated & Decided On Merits ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Hon'Ble Itat Is Justified In Dismissing The Miscellaneous Application Of The Revenue Without Discussing The Merits Ignoring The Legislative Intent Expressed In Cbdt'S Anuradha 2020.02.12 17:37 I Attest To The Accuracy & Integrity Of This Document

TDS Management Consultant Pvt. Ld. ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN *** Present : Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing counsel for the appellant. *** AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') against the order dated 27.3.2019 relating