BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,840Delhi5,477Bangalore2,647Chennai2,220Kolkata1,784Pune1,036Patna744Ahmedabad688Hyderabad580Cochin569Karnataka474Jaipur444Indore393Chandigarh353Nagpur263Raipur244Lucknow160Visakhapatnam143Rajkot133Surat129Jodhpur108Cuttack100Ranchi82Telangana68Panaji64Agra61Amritsar59Guwahati55Dehradun55Jabalpur41SC25Calcutta21Allahabad19Kerala17Varanasi12Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6J&K5Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Uttarakhand2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1947Section 2634TDS4Section 11(1)(a)2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ROHTAK vs. M/S CRYSTAL PHOSPHATES LTD

ITA/140/2013HC Punjab & Haryana28 Mar 2023

Bench: MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI,MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Section 144Section 80

deduction under Section 80-G. (10) The assessee-company had claimed total expenses of Rs.1,97,72,54,772/- under different heads in the P & L Account. No details were furnished by the assessee to prove the genuineness of these expenses. Moreover, the expenses under various heads were allowable only when TDS

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) GURUGRAM vs. M/S MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY TRUST

ITA/41/2021HC Punjab & Haryana24 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 11(1)(a)Section 263

deduction of TDS in the payments and the entire accounts were fraudulent. 6. Learned counsel for the Revenue further submitted

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED

Appeals are dismissed

ITA/42/2021HC Punjab & Haryana10 Mar 2025

Bench: MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL,MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA

Section 194

TDS)-2, Chandigarh …Appellant Vs. M/s Vodafone Idea Limited (earlier known as Vodafone Mobile Services Limited). ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocate for the appellant(s). *** LISA GILL , J. (ORAL) 1. All the above titled four appeals are being taken up together for hearing at request

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) - 2 CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD.

The appeals are hereby dismissed

ITA/8533/2018HC Punjab & Haryana07 Nov 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 194

TDS)-2, Chandigarh . . . . Appellant Vs. M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. . . . . Respondent Date of Decision: 07.11.2024 **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH **** Present: Mr. Amanpreet (A.P.) Singh, Senior Standing Counsel, for the appellant(s)/Income Tax Department. Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Jolly, Advocate (through video conferencing) For the respondent(s). **** SANJEEV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS)-1, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD, PLOT NO. 21, I.T. PARK, CHANDIGARH (TAN: PTLB10577A)

ITA/433/2018HC Punjab & Haryana12 Sept 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Section 194

TDS)-1, C Vs. irtel Ltd. Chandigarh **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAN **** Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Co for the Income Tax Department/R Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate an Mr. Smeesh Bassi, Advocate For **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) By way of this common order, These appeals have been preferr order passed