DCIT CIRCLE 1 NASHIK, NASHIK vs. SHREE SAI PROPERTIES, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

survey no. 367/3 at Makhmalabad, Nashik to members of the Kokani Family vide 11 separate agreements. It is seen that prior to the sale of these plots to Kokani Family, these were agreed to be sold to M/s Dhananjay Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Of Thakkar Group vide agreement dated 25.04.2013. However, on the request of Thakkar Group, the appellant cancelled

DINESHKUMAR RAMCHANDRA TULSYAN (HUF),,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(5),, NASHIK

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2014-15 Dineshkumar Ramchandra Tulsyan (Huf) Ito, Ward 1(5), 214B, Laxmi Niwas, Mahatma Nagar, Vs. Nashik Nashik – 422007 Pan: Aachd5953R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Sumandevi Dineshkumar Tulsyan Ito, Ward 1(5), 214B, Laxmi Niwas, Mahatma Nagar, Vs. Nashik Nashik – 422007 Pan: Ackpt1322Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

133A of the Act was carried out in the case of Laxmivilas Buildcon Ltd., Nashik in which the assessee Shri Dineshkumar R. Tulsyan is a Director and his statement was recorded u/s 131 of the Act. The survey continued upto 4.30 AM on 02.09.2015. Although the assessee, during the course of survey in the case of Laxmivilas Buildcon

SMT. SUMANDEVI DINESHKUMAR TULSYAN,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(5),, NASHIK

133A of the Act was carried out in the case of Laxmivilas Buildcon\nLtd., Nashik in which the assessee Shri Dineshkumar R. Tulsyan is a Director and\nhis statement was recorded u/s 131 of the Act. The survey continued upto 4.30\nAM on 02.09.2015. Although the assessee, during the course of survey in the case\nof Laxmivilas Buildcon

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

survey on assessee. On revenue's appeal, High Court confirmed\norder of Tribunal. The SLP filed by the Department was dismissed by Hon'ble\nSupreme Court holding that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by\nHigh Court.\n\n8.8 Among others, the appellant placed his reliance on the decision of Hon'ble\nJurisdictional Bombay High Court

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

survey on assessee. On revenue's appeal, High Court confirmed\norder of Tribunal. The SLP filed by the Department was dismissed by Hon'ble\nSupreme Court holding that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by\nHigh Court.\n\n8.8 Among others, the appellant placed his reliance on the decision of Hon'ble\nJurisdictional Bombay High Court

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

survey on assessee. On revenue's appeal, High Court confirmed\norder of Tribunal. The SLP filed by the Department was dismissed by Hon'ble\nSupreme Court holding that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by\nHigh Court.\n\n8.8 Among others, the appellant placed his reliance on the decision of Hon'ble\nJurisdictional Bombay High Court