BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

77 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka290Pune77Mumbai75Delhi63Hyderabad42Bangalore32Raipur17Kolkata14Jaipur10Chennai8SC7Surat5Telangana3Rajkot2Ahmedabad2Lucknow1Chandigarh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Addition to Income45Deduction34Section 37(1)31Section 143(3)7Section 92C4Transfer Pricing4Comparables/TP4Section 79A3Section 453

PADAMSHREE DR. D.Y.PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1080/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

MAHANKALI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,SANGLI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, SANGLI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 314/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Showing 1–20 of 77 · Page 1 of 4

Disallowance3
TP Method3
Bench:
Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

BHIMASHANKAR SSK LTD,,PUNE vs. DY. CIT, PUNE

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2453/PUN/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

APPASAHEB NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA SSK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1045/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

PADAMSHREE DR. D.Y.PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1081/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

PADAMSHREE DR. D.Y.PATIL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1082/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

SHRI BHOGAWATI SAH. SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 994/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

APPASAHEB NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA SSK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1044/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

APPASAHEB NALAWADE GADHINGLAJ TALUKA SSK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1046/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

JAWAHAR SHETKARI SSK LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ICHALKARANJ,, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2153/PUN/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

MANGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,SANGLI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, SANGLI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 603/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

KUMBHI KASARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 718/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

JAWAHAR SHETKARI SSK LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 821/PUN/2017[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

JAWAHAR SHETKARI SSK LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 822/PUN/2017[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

JAWAHAR SHETKARI SSK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 825/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

SHRI CHH. SHAHU SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 856/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

SHRI CHH. SHAHU SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 858/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

VISHWASRAO NAIK SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,SANGLI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, SANGLI

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 872/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

SHRI BHOGAWATI SAH. SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 992/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded

KUMBHI KASARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeals of assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 716/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

Section 37(1)

section 40A(2) of the Act, as has been held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court supra. Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed a reasonable opportunity of hearing by the AO in such fresh determination of the issue.” 3. In view of the above, the issue involving excess cane price in all the respective assessees remanded