BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Delhi28Pune4Surat4Indore3Jaipur3Kolkata3Amritsar2Cuttack2Chennai2Visakhapatnam1Chandigarh1Hyderabad1Rajkot1Varanasi1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 271A6Section 92D6Section 271B6Section 273B5Section 44A5Section 271G4Penalty4Section 92D(3)3Transfer Pricing3Section 92E

SEQUENCE DESIGN (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE MAHARASHTRA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2106/PUN/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 May 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2106/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta
Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 273BSection 92D(1)

Transfer Pricing adjustment of earlier years. 2.3 The learned CIT(A) erred on the facts and in law by not appreciating that there was a reasonable cause for not reporting the transaction of Rs 4,07,42,345/- in Form 3CEB considering the provisions of section 273B

2

M/S. JYOTI PAPER UDYOG LTD,NASHIK vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 702/PUN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal, Hon. Vice- & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Hon.M/S. Jyoti Paper Udyog Ltd., Vs Acit, Circle-1, Plot No.B67, Nice, Midc Nashik. Satpur, Nashik – 422 007 Pan: Aaacj 7288 E Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Sanket M. Joshi, Ca Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde, Dr Date Of Hearing : 06/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 20/09/2023 O R D E R Per Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm: This Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Emanates From The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Dated 28.04.2023 For A.Y.2013-14 As Per The Grounds Of Appeal On Record.

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. Joshi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde, DR
Section 271ASection 273BSection 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 92CSection 92DSection 92E

transfer pricing provisions were made applicable to specified domestic transactions as well. Considering all these facts, let us examine the issue whether the case of the assessee falls within the ambit of „reasonable cause‟ as provided u/sec. 273B of the Act or not. Sec.273B of the Act encompasses various situations where penalty may not be levied, if reasonable cause

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1 (2),, PUNE vs. FRANCOIS COMPRESSORS INDIA PRIVATE LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1504/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 1504/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Pune. .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Francois Compressors India Pvt. Ltd. Gat No.147/1 (New), Pirangut, Village Lavale Road, Tal. Mulshi, Pune-412 115 Pan : Aabcf0496K ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sharad A ShahFor Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe
Section 271Section 271GSection 274Section 92C(3)Section 92DSection 92D(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and thereafter, the TPO in his order dated 29.01.2016 u/s. 92C(3) of the Act had accepted 3 A.Y.2012-13 the value of international transactions with regard to Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the assessee and the said was not disturbed by the TPO. The assessee had further submitted that the basic purpose for furnishing

BENCHMARRK REALTY LLP,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

ITA 1396/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1396/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Benchmarrk Realty Llp, The Dcit, Circle-8, Pune. Sr.No.17/19, Near Balaji V Temple, Kate Wasti, Punawale, S Pune – 411033. Pan: Aanfb 7064 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 09/12/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/12/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-6, Pune Dated 25.07.2019 Emanating From Order Of Assessing Officer Dated 22.03.2018 Under Section 271B Of The Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2015- 16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 271BSection 273BSection 44A

273B of ITA, 1961. 4. The appellant craves leave to add / amend / alter / delete any of the above grounds of appeal.” 2. Brief facts of the case as per the assessment order, are that the assessee had filed return of income electronically for A.Y.2015-16 declaring total income of Rs.33,80,870/-.Assessee was in the business of Builder and developer