Search: transfer pricing

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai44 Jaipur21 Indore19 Hyderabad8 Chennai5 Delhi5 Pune3 Amritsar2 Cuttack2 Kolkata1 Bangalore1 SC1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Penalty3 Section 2502 Section 271A2 Section 1482 Section 69D2

SEQUENCE DESIGN (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE MAHARASHTRA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2106/PUN/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 May 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2106/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta

Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271ASection 273BSection 92D(1)

Transfer Pricing adjustment already offered to tax in the A.Y. 2009-10 to A.Y. 2014-15, it was excluded while computing the total income for A.Y. 2014-15. On the strength of these facts, it was stated that assessee had reasonable cause not to report the said transaction in Form No.3CEB and therefore no penalty is leviable u/s.271AA

SEQUENCE DESIGN (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE MAHARASHTRA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) PUNE, PUNE

SEQUENCE DESIGN (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE MAHARASHTRA vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) PUNE, PUNE

RADHAMADHAV REALCON PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE - 10,, PUNE

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGBAD, AURANGBAD vs. SANJAY SUGANCHAND KASLIWAL, AURANGABAD