MR SHAIKH SHAKIL SHAIKH IBRAHIM BAGWAN,JALGAON vs. ITO, WRD-1(4), JALGAON, JALGAON
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2160/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2160/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Mr. Shaikh Shakil Shaikh Vs Ito, Ward-1(4), Ibrahim Bagwan, Jalgaon Prop. Of Javed Vegetable Company (Jvc), Barbhai Galli, Bodwad-425310, Dist-Jalgaon Maharashtra Pan-Attpb3077C Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Harshit Bari, Addl. CIT
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250
prices and other inevitable expenses. All the other arguments in the written submissions are for the legal issues challenging the validity of reopening, validity of the approval and other judicial issues.
6. On the other hand Departmental Representative (DR) vehemently argued supporting the order of the Ld. CIT(A).
7. We have heard rival contentions and perused the records placed
