Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 10(2)(xv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi115 Mumbai104 Chandigarh58 Jaipur27 Hyderabad25 Guwahati16 Nagpur12 Jodhpur10 Ahmedabad9 SC9 Bangalore5 Cochin4 Lucknow4 Chennai3 Pune2 Surat2 Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)3 Section 139(1)2 Section 132(4)2 Section 115J2

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ,PUNE vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri S Ananthan & Smt. Abarna CAFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar CIT-DR

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(viia)

10. He submitted that following the above decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for assessment year 2015-16 has also restored the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication with similar directions. He accordingly submitted that this ground has to be restored to the file of the Assessing

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ,PUNE vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ,PUNE vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

SHRI MANOJ MADANLAL CHHAJED,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1)PUNE, PUNE