BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi54Chennai41Jaipur18Surat16Agra14Jodhpur12Bangalore11Mumbai10Amritsar6Ahmedabad5Hyderabad5Pune4Indore4Cuttack4Kolkata3Lucknow3Chandigarh2Raipur1Rajkot1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)4Section 454Addition to Income4Section 472Section 143(2)2Section 2632Section 143(3)2Demonetization2

SONAL SANDEEP SATAV,PUNE vs. PCIT, PUNE-2, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 945/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Astha Chandra & Shree G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

Transfer Pricing Officer for determination of arm's length price in respect of international transactions reported for the relevant assessment year. Then paragraph 4, along with its sub paragraphs 4.1 to 47 deal with disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) in the context of commission exceeding Re. 18.00 crore paid by the Assessee during the relevant assessment year, even though

RAJKAMAL STONE METAL WORKS,AMBEGAON KHURD, DIST. PUNE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 5 PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 691/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 2(47)Section 45Section 47

demonetized currency to M/s. Shaheed Lt. Col Prakash Patil Petroleum.” 3. Accordingly, statutory notices u/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) were issued and served on the assessee to which, the AR of the assessee appeared before the Assessing Officer from time to time and filed the requisite details. 4. During

MRS SHANTABAI JASRAJ LODHA,AHMEDNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1389/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: the AO as follows:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak

demonetization period. It was contended by the assessee before the AO as follows: “5. In response to this, the assessee has filed online reply on 23.09.2019 and stated is as under:- MY husband sold HUF agricultural land to Saibaba Sansthan Trust Shirdi in the year 2006-07 and he had filed I.T. return for that period and paid capital gain

KRISH WINES,JALGAON vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1,, JALGAON

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2098/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 145Section 69A

transferred from the ITO, Ward\n2(2), Jalgaon to DCIT, Circle – 2, Jalgaon (now Circle – 1, Jalgaon) on 08.04.2019\nas per jurisdiction. Notice u/s 142(1) of the Act on 20.05.2019 along with\nquestionnaire asking the assessee to file certain details regarding the scrutiny\nassessment.\nSecond notice u/s 142(1) of the Act was issued on 31.10.2019\nrequesting the assessee