Search: section 68

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai70 Delhi29 Bangalore20 Surat17 Ahmedabad9 Guwahati8 Chennai7 Pune7 Kolkata3 Jodhpur3 Chandigarh3 Rajkot3 Indore1 Amritsar1 Jaipur1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 12A36 Section 10(20)24 Section 1124 Section 143(3)12 Section 143(1)10 Addition to Income7 Section 2636 Section 1426 Exemption6 TDS

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 543/PUN/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda

Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

80J(6A) and s. 12A of the Act are para materia. The ratio of the law laid down in Jaideep Industries’ case (supra) would have been applicable to the facts of the present case as well had the CBDT not issued the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978, reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment. As per this circular

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CONTROS LTD.,PUNE vs. DCIT CIRCLE 8, PUNE, PUNE