BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

249 results for “section 68”+ Section 76clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,964Mumbai2,254Bangalore784Chennai649Karnataka623Ahmedabad604Kolkata504Jaipur440Hyderabad417Indore314Surat290Cochin281Chandigarh272Pune249Visakhapatnam112Raipur110Rajkot94Cuttack91Telangana81Lucknow75Calcutta67Amritsar57Allahabad52Guwahati49Nagpur47SC47Jodhpur38Ranchi28Agra25Dehradun22Patna13Rajasthan11Varanasi8Orissa7Jabalpur4Panaji4Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Kerala1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)72Addition to Income54Section 13248Section 12A45Section 6841Section 26332Section 14827Section 153A24Section 143(2)23Survey u/s 133A

SOPAN BANDOBA CHAVAN,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 869/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 68

76,300/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under the parameters of manual scrutiny. Accordingly, statutory notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) along with 2 questionnaire were issued and served on the assessee, in response to which the AR of the assessee appeared before the Assessing Officer

Showing 1–20 of 249 · Page 1 of 13

...
22
Penalty12
Deduction12

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7, PUNE vs. LB KUNJIR, PUNE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the three appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 240/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69ASection 69BSection 80I

76,525/- in subsequent assessment years which shall be in contradiction to the provisions of section 115BBE(2) of the Act. The provisions of section 115BBE(2) are quite clear that no deduction is allowed against deemed income added u/s 68

M/S. L.B. KUNJIR,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the three appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 418/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69ASection 69BSection 80I

76,525/- in subsequent assessment years which shall be in contradiction to the provisions of section 115BBE(2) of the Act. The provisions of section 115BBE(2) are quite clear that no deduction is allowed against deemed income added u/s 68

DCIT, PUNE vs. L B KUNJIR, PUNE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the three appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1088/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69ASection 69BSection 80I

76,525/- in subsequent assessment years which shall be in contradiction to the provisions of section 115BBE(2) of the Act. The provisions of section 115BBE(2) are quite clear that no deduction is allowed against deemed income added u/s 68

DCIT CIRCLE 7, BODHI TOWER SALISBURY PARK vs. L B KUNJIR, PUNE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the three appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1046/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69ASection 69BSection 80I

76,525/- in subsequent assessment years which shall be in contradiction to the provisions of section 115BBE(2) of the Act. The provisions of section 115BBE(2) are quite clear that no deduction is allowed against deemed income added u/s 68

M/S. L.B. KUNJIR,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and the three appeals filed by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 417/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 115BSection 133ASection 69ASection 69BSection 80I

76,525/- in subsequent assessment years which shall be in contradiction to the provisions of section 115BBE(2) of the Act. The provisions of section 115BBE(2) are quite clear that no deduction is allowed against deemed income added u/s 68

TARA CONSTRUCTIONS ,PUNE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 531/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

76,91,876/- to the total income of the Appellant under section 68 of the Act. The addition so made

JAIBHAGWAN BANARASIDAS JINDAL,JALNA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2016/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Jaiprakash BairagraFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 10(38)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

section 68 without bringing on record any material or evidence to prove that the long term capital gain declared by the Appellant is an accommodation entry against which appellant paid cash. 13 11. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee strongly challenged the order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC in confirming the validity of re-assessment proceedings as well

HEM KIRAN DIESELS,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are dismissed

ITA 131/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Feb 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.436/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 V J & Sons, 1227 E Ward, Rajaram Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Kolhapur – 416008 …. Pan: Aabfv0324M Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Central Circle, Kolhapur

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: S/Shri Abhijit Halder and Sudendu Das
Section 131Section 131(1)(d)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 68

section 68 of the Act. The assessee before us has filed chart evidencing the amount received but has not clarified the date on which the said 14 V J & Sons & Anr. amount was received, though it is not disputed that it was received during financial year 2007-08. Again in the chart, date of cheque is not mentioned

V J & SONS,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are dismissed

ITA 436/PUN/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Feb 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.436/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 V J & Sons, 1227 E Ward, Rajaram Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Kolhapur – 416008 …. Pan: Aabfv0324M Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Central Circle, Kolhapur

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: S/Shri Abhijit Halder and Sudendu Das
Section 131Section 131(1)(d)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 68

section 68 of the Act. The assessee before us has filed chart evidencing the amount received but has not clarified the date on which the said 14 V J & Sons & Anr. amount was received, though it is not disputed that it was received during financial year 2007-08. Again in the chart, date of cheque is not mentioned

RAJENDRA MOHANLAL AGRAWAL,JALNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 514/PUN/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

76,000/- was also found at the time of survey which was more than the cash as per books of account by an amount of Rs.9,51,000/-. The assessee disclosed the amount of excess stock of Rs.21,49,000/- and excess cash of Rs.9,51,000/- for taxation as additional income over and above the regular income

RAHUL NEMGONDA PATIL,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 2522/PUN/2024[AY 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Jun 2025
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 68

section 68 of the Act\nas unexplained cash credit. He, however, contended that the addition\nshould be restricted only to peak credit to the extent of Rs.15,27,000/-.\nHe argued that bringing to tax the gross amount of cash deposits would\nresult in double taxation of the same income as the amounts withdrawn\nwould be always available against

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1894/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 607/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 610/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1895/PUN/2024[2018 19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD vs. SMT. ASHA B. KADAM, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1896/PUN/2024[2018 19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity

SMT ASHA BHAGWANRAO KADAM,PUNE vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 611/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrait(Ss)A Nos.39 & 40/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR and Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 271DSection 271E

76,910/-. A search action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in Disha (Kotgire) Group of Aurangabad, Pune and Kolkata on 21.01.2020. The Kotgire Group is headed by Shri Devanand Narayan Kotgire (DNK in short) of Aurangabad and the main concerns of the group are under the brand name of DISHA. The group is engaged in real estate activity