PRAKASH RAMAN CHAUDHARI,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,
In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed
ITA 740/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 May 2018AY 2011-12
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.737 To 740/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Prakash Raman Chaudhari, Garden View Bunglow, Saptashrungi Colony, Old Gangapur Naka, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Nashik – 422005 …. Pan:Aajpc9817C Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Central)-I, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nashik
For Appellant: Shri Kishore Phadke
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 271(1)(c)
73 taxmann.com 241 (Kar), wherein SLP has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and it was held as under:-
“13. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The issue arising in the present bunch of appeals is jurisdictional issue of levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The requirement
