Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai54 Delhi27 Kolkata9 Bangalore7 Raipur6 Surat5 Jaipur3 Pune3 Chennai2 Hyderabad2 Rajkot2 Ahmedabad2 SC1 Chandigarh1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 55A3 Capital Gains3 Addition to Income3 Section 14A2 Section 194C2 Section 143(2)2 Business Income2

HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR,RATNAGIRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RATNAGIRI WARD, RATNAGIRI

ITA 264/PUN/2024[AY 2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 194C

68 in the year under appeal cannot be made. Further, all flat booking advances are either against registered agreement to sales or flat allotment letters most of which have duly been got converted into sales in the subsequent period. This fact is duly confirmed by the ITO while making addition u/s. 43CA. 7.3 I have gone through the submissions

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLE 1, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR vs. HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR, MAHARASHTRA

ITA 23/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed

HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR,RATNAGIRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RATNAGIRI WARD, RATNAGIRI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLE 1, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR vs. HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR, MAHARASHTRA

HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR,RATNAGIRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RATNAGIRI WARD, RATNAGIRI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRLE 1, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR vs. HAMAJA MOHAMMED MALPEKAR, MAHARASHTRA

VASANT HANUMANT BUCHADE,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 10(2),, PUNE