BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Ahmedabad29Mumbai13Kolkata10Bangalore7Delhi5Pune4Hyderabad4Jaipur4Lucknow2Amritsar2Cochin2Patna2Surat1Chandigarh1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Karnataka1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 40A(3)7Section 44A5Addition to Income4Section 2633Section 143(2)3Section 43D3Section 43B3Deduction3Set Off of Losses

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 801/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

68,339.10 is not\nappearing on Liability side of the Balance Sheet under the heading\nReserves and Other Funds but is separately disclosed as Overdue Interest.\nSimilarly in the Profit and Loss Account the amount of Rs.47,01,85,366.04\n[being the interest on N.P.A. during the year] is not appearing under the\nheading Provisions but is debited under

3

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 802/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

43C of the Income-tax Act on the scheduled bank.\n11. Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue placed reliance on the\njudgment in the case of Southern Technologies Ltd. (supra). However, this\njudgment pertains to non-banking financial companies. UCO Bank's case\n(supra) and Mercantile Bank Ltd. (supra) case squarely applies to the facts\nof the present case

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, INCOME TAX OFFICE, JALNA vs. THE BEED DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD., BEED

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 800/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43BSection 43D

68,339.10 is not\nappearing on Liability side of the Balance Sheet under the heading\nReserves and Other Funds but is separately disclosed as Overdue Interest.\nSimilarly in the Profit and Loss Account the amount of Rs.47,01,85,366.04\n[being the interest on N.P.A. during the year] is not appearing under the\nheading Provisions but is debited under

SANJAY VASANTRAO WANI,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2491/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Jun 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2491/Pun/2016 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi
Section 40A(3)Section 44A

68,670/-. Assessee did not maintain books of account exclusively for the Real Estate business. He however maintained books of account for the commission and 2 Sanjay Vasantrao Wani brokerage income. There is no dispute about the taxation of commission income. However, the dispute is about the income from Real Estate business. Considering the facts that the assessee