BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai37Karnataka21Jaipur15Ahmedabad10Delhi9Mumbai8Pune6Chandigarh5Lucknow3Bangalore2SC1Cuttack1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 12A36Section 10(20)24Section 1124Section 143(3)12Section 143(1)6Section 2636Section 1426Exemption6TDS6Addition to Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 545/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated

6

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1153/MUM/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1154/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1155/MUM/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 544/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 543/PUN/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

K Meenatchi Sundaram Department by : S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda (Virtual) Date of hearing : 29-07-2025 Date of pronouncement : 30-09-2025 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, V.P: The above appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee are cross appeals and are directed against the separate orders dated