Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai13 Pune5 Chandigarh3 Delhi3 Hyderabad3 Bangalore2 Panaji2 Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 15421 Section 167B11 Section 111A8 Section 112A6 Section 234C6 Rectification u/s 1545 Section 143(1)4 Section 2503 Section 167A3 Charitable Trust

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INTERLOCKING SURGEONS,SOLAPUR, MAHARASHTRA vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2560/PUN/2024[AAATN9300L]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Feb 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2816, 2817 & 2560/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2014-15 & 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay K. Dhivare

Section 154Section 167ASection 167BSection 250

68 SOT 163]. 11. Facts being identical following the above decisions. I hold that the provisions of section 167B

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INTERLOCKING SURGEONS,SOLAPUR, MAHARASHTRA vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

3

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2817/PUN/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Feb 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2816, 2817 & 2560/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2014-15 & 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay K. Dhivare

Section 154Section 167ASection 167BSection 250

68 SOT 163]. 11. Facts being identical following the above decisions. I hold that the provisions of section 167B

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INTERLOCKING SURGEONS,SOLAPUR, MAHARASHTRA vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2816/PUN/2024[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Feb 2025AY 2010-2011

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2816, 2817 & 2560/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2014-15 & 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay K. Dhivare

Section 154Section 167ASection 167BSection 250

68 SOT 163]. 11. Facts being identical following the above decisions. I hold that the provisions of section 167B

HREYANSH VASUNDHARA FAMILY TRUST,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1795/PUN/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kiran SanmaneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Section 111ASection 112Section 112ASection 143(1)Section 167Section 167BSection 2(290)Section 234C

167B rws 2(29C) are applicable, the whole income would be subjected to highest slab of taxation for the given income, irrespective of the nature of income. 4. In not appreciating that the words "rate of income-tax (including surcharge on income-tax, if any)" in section 2(290) denotes two separate levies and hence MMR does not automatically

HREYANSH VASUNDHARA FAMILY TRUST,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1794/PUN/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Kiran SanmaneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde

Section 111ASection 112Section 112ASection 143(1)Section 167Section 167BSection 2(290)Section 234C

167B rws 2(29C) are applicable, the whole income would be subjected to highest slab of taxation for the given income, irrespective of the nature of income. 4. In not appreciating that the words "rate of income-tax (including surcharge on income-tax, if any)" in section 2(290) denotes two separate levies and hence MMR does not automatically