ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

In the result, all the above 6 appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

68,24,174 at the special rate under section 115BBE. Based on the facts, circumstances and legal issues brought out in the foregoing paragraphs, I allow the claim that the income in question is a bonafide LTCG arising from the sale of M/s. PFL Infotech Ltd. shares, which is exempt from income-tax u/s.10(38) of the Act. Therefore

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

In the result, all the above 6 appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

68,24, 174 at the special rate under section 115BBE. Based on the facts, circumstances and legal issues brought out in the foregoing paragraphs, I allow the claim that the income in question is a bonafide LTCG arising from the sale of M/s. PFL Infotech Ltd. shares, which is exempt from income-tax u/s.10(38) of the Act. Therefore

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992 for non-disclosures under PIT Regulations, 1992. He submitted that the SEBI has also noted that price manipulation in the scrip of M/s PFIL was orchestrated by two connected entities and facilitated by their connected broker. The manipulation involved in these two entities repeatedly placing buy orders at prices substantially higher

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992 for non-disclosures under PIT Regulations, 1992. He submitted that the SEBI has also noted that price manipulation in the scrip of M/s PFIL was orchestrated by two connected entities and facilitated by their connected broker. The manipulation involved in these two entities repeatedly placing buy orders at prices substantially higher

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act, 1992 for non-disclosures under PIT Regulations, 1992. He submitted that the SEBI has also noted that price manipulation in the scrip of M/s PFIL was orchestrated by two connected entities and facilitated by their connected broker. The manipulation involved in these two entities repeatedly placing buy orders at prices substantially higher

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the cross objection of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita No.1381/Pun/2003 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 1998-09 वष"

15A, Chikhali Village, Pimpri, Pune – 411 018 PAN : AABCM1789L …. Cross Objector Vs. DCIT, Circle-8, Pune …. Respondent Assessee by : Shri Pramod Achuthan Revenue by : Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT सुनवाई क" तारीख / घोषणा क" तारीख / Date of Hearing : 18.06.2018 Date of Pronouncement: 08.08.2018 आदेश / ORDER आदेश आदेश आदेश PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM : There are 3 appeals under consideration

DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the cross objection of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita No.1381/Pun/2003 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 1998-09 वष"

15A, Chikhali Village, Pimpri, Pune – 411 018 PAN : AABCM1789L …. Cross Objector Vs. DCIT, Circle-8, Pune …. Respondent Assessee by : Shri Pramod Achuthan Revenue by : Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT सुनवाई क" तारीख / घोषणा क" तारीख / Date of Hearing : 18.06.2018 Date of Pronouncement: 08.08.2018 आदेश / ORDER आदेश आदेश आदेश PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM : There are 3 appeals under consideration