PRAKASH RAMAN CHAUDHARI,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,
In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed
ITA 738/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 May 2018AY 2008-09
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.737 To 740/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2008-09, 2010-11 & 2011-12 Prakash Raman Chaudhari, Garden View Bunglow, Saptashrungi Colony, Old Gangapur Naka, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Nashik – 422005 …. Pan:Aajpc9817C Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Central)-I, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Nashik
For Appellant: Shri Kishore Phadke
Section 132Section 133ASection 153ASection 271(1)(c)
12. We find that the issue has been decided by the Tribunal in the case of Satish Dondulal Parakh Vs. ACIT (supra). In such case also, penalty proceedings were initiated without mentioning any of the limbs of section 271(1)(c) of the Act and penalty was levied for concealing particulars of income for furnishing inaccurate particulars
