BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,,RAIGAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1520/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm
u/s 143(3) had expired, the AO issued notices
u/s.148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’).
After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned
assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100%
of bogus purchases in most of the cases. The ld. CsIT(A) in some cases
confirmed the addition
