MADHURI DHANANJAUY MARATHE,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(4), NASHIK
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed
ITA 1639/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Aug 2018AY 2009-10
Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1639 & 1640/Pun/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Smt. Madhuri Dhananjay Marathe, 3, Yashodhara Apartment, Chinchkhed Road, At Post Pimpalgaon (B), Taluka- Niphad, Nashik Pan : Amjpm4024B .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.
For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 44A
35,000/-
were shown; but the assessee had failed to explain source of the income. The
Assessing Officer recorded reasons for re-opening of assessment proceedings
under section 147 of the Act. Notice under section 148 of the Act was issued. The
assessee vide letter dated 26.12.2014 stated that the return of income filed on
10.03.2011 may be treated
