BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai155Delhi95Bangalore47Jaipur42Raipur40Ahmedabad37Chandigarh31Guwahati30Amritsar24Chennai23Nagpur14Indore12Jodhpur10Hyderabad8Pune7Kolkata5Patna5Surat2Rajkot2Lucknow1Ranchi1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 25010Section 270A8Section 69A8Section 1477Section 1487Addition to Income7Section 139(5)6Natural Justice6Section 139(1)4Section 69B

SUNIL SHRIRANG PAWAR,SATARA vs. ITO WARD 2 SATARA , SATARA

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1124/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1124 To 1127/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas S. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Pramod Shahakar
Section 147Section 250Section 69A

196, Karanje Peth, Ward-2, Satara Satara – 415 001, Satara, Maharashtra PAN : AFSPP9102K Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Suhas S. Kulkarni Respondent by : Shri Pramod Shahakar Date of hearing : 03.11.2025 Date of pronouncement : 10.11.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : The captioned appeals at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Yrs. 2014-15 to A.Y. 2017-18 are directed against the separate

4
Unexplained Money4
Deduction3

SUNIL SHRIRANG PAWAR,SATARA vs. ITO WARD 2 SATARA, SATARA

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1125/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1124 To 1127/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas S. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Pramod Shahakar
Section 147Section 250Section 69A

196, Karanje Peth, Ward-2, Satara Satara – 415 001, Satara, Maharashtra PAN : AFSPP9102K Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Suhas S. Kulkarni Respondent by : Shri Pramod Shahakar Date of hearing : 03.11.2025 Date of pronouncement : 10.11.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : The captioned appeals at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Yrs. 2014-15 to A.Y. 2017-18 are directed against the separate

SUNIL SHRIRANG PAWAR,SATARA vs. ITO WARD 2 SATARA, SATARA

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1126/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1124 To 1127/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas S. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Pramod Shahakar
Section 147Section 250Section 69A

196, Karanje Peth, Ward-2, Satara Satara – 415 001, Satara, Maharashtra PAN : AFSPP9102K Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Suhas S. Kulkarni Respondent by : Shri Pramod Shahakar Date of hearing : 03.11.2025 Date of pronouncement : 10.11.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : The captioned appeals at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Yrs. 2014-15 to A.Y. 2017-18 are directed against the separate

SUNIL SHRIRANG PAWAR,SATARA vs. ITO WARD 2 SATARA, SATARA

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1127/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1124 To 1127/Pun/2025 Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas S. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Pramod Shahakar
Section 147Section 250Section 69A

196, Karanje Peth, Ward-2, Satara Satara – 415 001, Satara, Maharashtra PAN : AFSPP9102K Appellant Respondent Appellant by : Shri Suhas S. Kulkarni Respondent by : Shri Pramod Shahakar Date of hearing : 03.11.2025 Date of pronouncement : 10.11.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : The captioned appeals at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Yrs. 2014-15 to A.Y. 2017-18 are directed against the separate

KISHOR DIGAMBAR PATIL,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-2(1),NASHIK, NASHIK

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 55/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 54 & 55/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kishor Digambar Patil, 03, Saras Apartment, Patil Lane 04, College Rd., Nashik – 422005 Pan: Aarpp2052J . . . . . . . अपऩलधर्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Shri Shardul Sonawane & Ms Abhilasha PawarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath Murkunde
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)

reassessment order or through notice the specific circumstance or incidence i.e. specific clause (a) to clause (g) of s/s (2) of section 270 within which the case of the appellant falls so has to hold income as under-reported to trigger said penal provision. The failure continued further in identifying or determining and showcasing the specific action of the appellant

KISHOR DIGAMBAR PATIL,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK, NASHIK

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 54/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 54 & 55/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Kishor Digambar Patil, 03, Saras Apartment, Patil Lane 04, College Rd., Nashik – 422005 Pan: Aarpp2052J . . . . . . . अपऩलधर्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Shri Shardul Sonawane & Ms Abhilasha PawarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath Murkunde
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)

reassessment order or through notice the specific circumstance or incidence i.e. specific clause (a) to clause (g) of s/s (2) of section 270 within which the case of the appellant falls so has to hold income as under-reported to trigger said penal provision. The failure continued further in identifying or determining and showcasing the specific action of the appellant

JIVARAM MAGAJI CHAOUDHARY,PUNE vs. ACIT,CIRCLE 7, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1392/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1392/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 Jivaram Magaji Chaoudhary, Vs. Acit, Circle-7, Pune. Plot No.4, Road No.5, Snehdeep Palace, Tingrenagar, Pune- 411032. Pan : Aalpc3973B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri V. L. Jain Revenue By Shri Uma Shankar Prasad : Date Of Hearing : 26.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 25.03.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 05.03.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. There Is A Delay Of 48 Days In Filing Of The Present Appeal. In This Regard, The Assessee Has Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit. We Are Satisfied With The Explanation Of The Assessee That He Was Prevented By Reasonable

For Appellant: Shri V. L. Jain
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68Section 69BSection 69C

section 143(3) 81,31,985/- ” 4. After considering the reply of the assessee, Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC confirmed the addition of Rs.68,32,775/- by observing as under :- 4 “2.1 The Income Tax assessment for Ay 2010-11 was completed on 18/12/2012 assessing the above income u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) of the Act. Assessee held this land