BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment”+ Section 184clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi290Mumbai126Jaipur77Bangalore71Ahmedabad42Raipur38Chennai33Chandigarh28Cochin24Kolkata23Lucknow23Indore22Hyderabad22Amritsar14Surat13Patna13Pune9Cuttack9Visakhapatnam6Rajkot5Allahabad5Guwahati5Agra3Dehradun3Nagpur3Orissa3Telangana3SC2Calcutta1Jabalpur1Karnataka1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14825Section 14710Section 408Section 80I7Section 270A7Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 1975Reassessment5Section 12A

CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED ( SUCCESSOR OF ARICENT TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS LIMITED),PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1260/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Vyomesh PathakFor Respondent: Shri Vidya Ratna Kishore
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 155(18)Section 270ASection 270A(2)Section 270A(6)(a)Section 270A(7)Section 270A(8)Section 270A(9)

reassessment, referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (1), in a case where an order under sub- section (4) has been made accepting the application." 20. Sub-section (18) of Section 155 of the Income Tax Act is inserted vide Finance Act, 2022 w.e.f. 01.04.2022. The above referred provisions provide that deduction of any surcharge, cess, which

4
Deduction3
Charitable Trust2

DCIT CIRCLE 1 NASHIK, NASHIK vs. SHREE SAI PROPERTIES, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 987/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Subodh Ratnaparkhi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde, CIT
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment under Sections 139, 147, 148, 149, 151 & 153. 28. The language of explanation 2 to new Section 148 is akin to Section 153A and Section 153C Corollary being that after seizing of operational period of Section 153A to 153D. the cases being dealt thereunder were circumscribed in the scope of newly substituted Section 148." We are in complete agreement

PUSHPADEVI SHIVLAL RATHI ,JALNA vs. ITO WARD-1, JALNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1995/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1995/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. Rathi &For Respondent: Shri B.S.Rajpurohit
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 197Section 250Section 69A

reassessment notice under section 148 of the new regime. Thus, in this illustration, the time limit for issuance of a 6 Pushpadevi Shivlal Rathi notice under section 148 of the new regime will end on 18 August 2022. 13. In the present case, deemed show cause notice (notice u/s.148 as per old regime) was issued to the Appellant

KISHOR KESARIMAL OSWAL,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(3), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 415/PUN/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

For Appellant: Shri M.K. Kulkarni & Mrs. J.R. ChandekarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 148Section 183Section 184Section 185Section 187Section 197

reassessment the amount was added as per the provision of IDS 2016 by noting as under: 2 ITA 415/PUN/2021 Kishor Kesarimal Oswal A.Y. 2011-12 “The assessee was declarant under IDS 2016 who have committed default in making payments as per schedule. As the assessee did not pay tax amount within specified time, the declaration became invalid. Action against

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, NASHIK vs. M/S. ZEAL INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 159/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi

For Appellant: Shri P.S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 40

184/- to M/s. Sun Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. on which appellant failed to deduct TDS as per provisions of section 194A of the IT Act. The AO noted that non deduction of TDS was violation of provisions of section 40(a)(ia) therefore, it was not an allowable expenses. Hence, the AO reopened the assessment proceeding

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE ,, AURANGABAD vs. M/S. EVEREST EDUCATION SOCIETY,, AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 1917/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos. 1916 & 1917/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption Circle, Aurangabad. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. M/S. Everest Education Society, C/O. Seema Nursing Home, Roshan Gate, Aurangabad Pan : Aaate2231P ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 115BSection 12ASection 147Section 148Section 80G

184/- against which it had applied Rs.2,28,40,334/- (i.e.60.99%) towards objects/maintenance, leaving a surplus of Rs.2,29,09,185/-. Even after taking into consideration exemption under section 11(1)(a) at 15% of gross receipt, amounting to Rs.68,00,664/- which is permitted to be accumulated without any conditions, there remains a taxable surplus of Rs.89

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE ,, AURANGABAD vs. M/S. EVEREST EDUCATION SOCIETY,, AURANGABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 1916/PUN/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos. 1916 & 1917/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10 The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Exemption Circle, Aurangabad. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिाम / V/S. M/S. Everest Education Society, C/O. Seema Nursing Home, Roshan Gate, Aurangabad Pan : Aaate2231P ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 115BSection 12ASection 147Section 148Section 80G

184/- against which it had applied Rs.2,28,40,334/- (i.e.60.99%) towards objects/maintenance, leaving a surplus of Rs.2,29,09,185/-. Even after taking into consideration exemption under section 11(1)(a) at 15% of gross receipt, amounting to Rs.68,00,664/- which is permitted to be accumulated without any conditions, there remains a taxable surplus of Rs.89

KARAN TEJRAJ BUILDERS,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -2 , PUNE

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 428/PUN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.428/Pun/2020 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/S. Karan Tejraj Builders, Unit 501, Karan Tej Bonita, Cts No. 1187/16, Off Ghole Road, Pune – 411 005. .......अपऩलधथी / Appellant Pan : Aaifk1891P

For Appellant: Shri S.N.PuranikFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 80I

184/-. In the Profit & Loss Account of the assessee, the sale of flat to the tune of Rs. 25,00,000/- was not recorded by the assessee and the same was only unearthed during the course of search action. 5. Accordingly, a notice u/s. 263 dated 27.12.2019 was issued and duly served on the assessee firm. In response to that

VIJAYSHREE ALLOYS PUNE PRIVATE LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal of assessee is partly allowed in the terms aforesaid

ITA 1049/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das
Section 2(22)(e)

184/ - on account of melting loss. It be held that, the loss claimed by the Appellant is correct. The entire addition/disallowance made may be kindly deleted. In the alternative, it be held that the addition/disallowance made is excessive. The appellant be granted just and proper relief in this respect. 2. On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case