ATUL VIJAY MADAN ,NASHIK vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -1, NASHIK
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 1529/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 May 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1529/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 Atul Vijay Madan, V The Dcit, 2 Pooja Apartment, Behind S Circle-1, Nashik. Karwa Mangal Karyalay, Sharanpur Road, Nashik-422002. Maharashtra. Pan: Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Sanket M Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde– Dr Date Of Hearing 23/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 07/05/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 13.05.2024 For Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.45,00,000 Made By The A.O. U/S 69 Towards Alleged Unexplained Loan
Section 132Section 148Section 153CSection 250Section 69
reassess total income of such other person of such assessment year in the manner provided in section 153A.
6. Section 153C of the I.T.Act starts with “Notwithstanding anything”. Thus, as per section 153C of the Act, whenever certain incriminating documents pertaining to assessee were found during search in the case of some person, then notice u/s.153C of the Act shall