BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

972 results for “reassessment”

Sorted by relevance

Delhi6,741Mumbai6,450Chennai1,942Kolkata1,652Bangalore1,542Ahmedabad1,258Jaipur1,114Pune972Hyderabad847Chandigarh555Raipur531Surat454Indore422Amritsar364Visakhapatnam355Cochin321Cuttack310Rajkot310Karnataka224Agra195Patna184Nagpur179Guwahati152Ranchi138Lucknow138Dehradun117Telangana111Jodhpur90Calcutta77Allahabad66SC50Panaji45Jabalpur40Orissa18Kerala17Varanasi16Rajasthan14Punjab & Haryana10Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2J&K1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Madhya Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 148205Section 147110Addition to Income73Reassessment56Section 25054Section 143(3)45Section 148A32Section 270A28Deduction27Section 69A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1812/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas Bora and Riya OswalFor Respondent: Shri S. Sadananda Singh, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 37Section 68

reassessment. 3) Without prejudice, the reassessment proceedings are further vitiated as the objections raised by the assessee against initiation of reassessment

Showing 1–20 of 972 · Page 1 of 49

...
26
Reopening of Assessment25
Section 6824

SATISH VISHNU THOMBARE, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. VARSHA PRAFULLA ZENDE, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1656/PUN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1656/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Satish Vishnu Thombare, Varsha Prafulla Zende, Income Tax Officer, Prop Of Bleach Chem Enterprises, Ward-1, Ahmednagar Vs. Industrial Estate, Shrirampur, Maharashtra-413709 Pan : Aabpz2541C अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Miss Shivani Shah (Virtual) Department By : Shri Akhilesh Srivastva Date Of Hearing : 06-08-2025 Date Of 29-10-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Miss Shivani Shah (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Srivastva
Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

reassessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of wrong reasons. The assessee stated that reassessment proceedings were initiated after recording

SHRI SHANTINATH BHAGWAN JAIN SHWETAMBAR MURTIPUJAK SANGH,PUNE vs. CIT, EXEMPTION,, PUNE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 203/PUN/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri V.L. JainFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 263

reassessment, the Assessing Officer does not assess or reassess the income which he has reason to believe has escaped assessment

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 305/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL vs. M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1093/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 304/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

ASHOK TANNA,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 354/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,,RAIGAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1519/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1,, NASHIK vs. CHANDRASHEKHAR ASHOK JOSHI,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1507/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

ADROIT ENTERPRISES,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 12/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

HEMANT SUBHASH OSWAL,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(5),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2192/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. M/S. MADHUBAN TRADE STEEL PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 916/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

CHANDRASHEKHAR ASHOK JOSHI,,NASHIK vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,,

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 53/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DACS ELECTROSYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2835/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

M/S. VIRAJ STEELS,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5 (1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2308/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

RENUKA AUTO COMPONENTS INDIA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1660/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

M/S. PRIMA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1951/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

M/S. ANIKET TRADING COMPANY,,NASHIK vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1914/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

MUKESHKUMAR PUKHRAJ MEHTA,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER , WARD -8(3),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1736/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL vs. M/S. NYKA STEEL PVT.LTD,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 451/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reassessment has been laid generally and two where there is specific challenge to the reassessment depending upon the peculiar facts