Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai66 Delhi51 Jaipur10 Kolkata7 Guwahati5 Chennai5 Hyderabad4 Pune4 Bangalore2 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 3512 Section 143(2)8 Section 1488 Section 80I4 Section 143(1)4 Section 143(3)4 Section 1474 Section 35(1)4 Deduction4

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1660/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 35Section 35(1)Section 80I

Penalty\nproceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act, for furnishing of inaccurate\nparticulars of income are initiated separately.\"\n5.\nBefore the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC the assessee, apart from challenging the\naddition on merit, challenged the validity of assessment on the ground that the\nerstwhile company High Technology Transmission System India Pvt. Ltd. in\nwhose name

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLIGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD